Ben.Demystifier 0.4.1
Ben.Demystifier
Output the modern C# 7.0+ features in stack traces that looks like the C# source code that generated them rather than IL formatted.
High performance understanding for stack traces
.NET stack traces output the compiler transformed methods; rather than the source code methods, which make them slow to mentally parse and match back to the source code.
The current output was good for C# 1.0; but has become progressively worse since C# 2.0 (iterators, generics) as new features are added to the .NET languages and at C# 7.1 the stack traces are esoteric (see: Problems with current stack traces).
Make error logs more productive
Output the modern C# 7.0+ features in stack traces in an understandable fashion that looks like the C# source code that generated them.
Usage
exception.Demystify()
Or instead of Environment.StackTrace
EnhancedStackTrace.Current()
Resolves the stack back to the C# source format of the calls (and is an inspectable list of stack frames)
Calling .ToString()
on the Demystified exception will produce a string stacktrace similar to the following (without the comments):
System.InvalidOperationException: Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute.
at bool System.Collections.Generic.List<T>+Enumerator.MoveNextRare()
at IEnumerable<string> Program.Iterator(int startAt)+MoveNext() // Resolved enumerator
at bool System.Linq.Enumerable+SelectEnumerableIterator<TSource, TResult>.MoveNext() // Resolved enumerator
at string string.Join(string separator, IEnumerable<string> values)
at string Program+GenericClass<TSuperType>.GenericMethod<TSubType>(ref TSubType value)
at async Task<string> Program.MethodAsync(int value) // Resolved async
at async Task<string> Program.MethodAsync<TValue>(TValue value) // Resolved async
at string Program.Method(string value)+()=>{} [0] // lambda source + ordinal
at string Program.Method(string value)+()=>{} [1] // lambda source + ordinal
at string Program.RunLambda(Func<string> lambda)
at (string val, bool) Program.Method(string value) // Tuple returning
at ref string Program.RefMethod(in string value)+LocalFuncRefReturn() // ref return local func
at int Program.RefMethod(in string value)+LocalFuncParam(string val) // local function
at string Program.RefMethod(in string value) // in param (readonly ref)
at (string val, bool) static Program()+(string s, bool b)=>{} // tuple return static lambda
at void static Program()+(string s, bool b)=>{} // void static lambda
at void Program.Start((string val, bool) param) // Resolved tuple param
at void Program.Start((string val, bool) param)+LocalFunc1(long l) // void local function
at bool Program.Start((string val, bool) param)+LocalFunc2(bool b1, bool b2) // bool return local function
at string Program.Start()
at void Program()+()=>{} // ctor defined lambda
at void Program(Action action)+(object state)=>{} // ctor defined lambda
at void Program.RunAction(Action<object> lambda, object state)
at new Program(Action action) // constructor
at new Program() // constructor
at void Program.Main(String[] args)
Calling .ToString()
on the same exception would produce the following output
System.InvalidOperationException: Collection was modified; enumeration operation may not execute.
at System.ThrowHelper.ThrowInvalidOperationException_InvalidOperation_EnumFailedVersion() // ? low value
at System.Collections.Generic.List`1.Enumerator.MoveNextRare()
at Program.<Iterator>d__3.MoveNext() // which enumerator?
at System.Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator`2.MoveNext() // which enumerator?
at System.String.Join(String separator, IEnumerable`1 values)
at Program.GenericClass`1.GenericMethod[TSubType](TSubType& value)
at Program.<MethodAsync>d__4.MoveNext() // which async overload?
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- // ? no value
at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() // ? no value
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) // ? no value
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter`1.GetResult() // ? no value
at Program.<MethodAsync>d__5`1.MoveNext() // which async overload?
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- // ? no value
at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() // ? no value
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) // ? no value
at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter`1.GetResult() // ? no value
at Program.<>c__DisplayClass8_0.<Method>b__0() // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.<>c__DisplayClass8_0.<Method>b__1() // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.RunLambda(Func`1 lambda)
at Program.Method(String value)
at Program.<RefMethod>g__LocalFuncRefReturn|10_1(<>c__DisplayClass10_0& ) // local function
at Program.<RefMethod>g__LocalFuncParam|10_0(String val, <>c__DisplayClass10_0& ) // local function
at Program.RefMethod(String value)
at Program.<>c.<.cctor>b__18_1(String s, Boolean b) // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.<>c.<.cctor>b__18_0(String s, Boolean b) // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.Start(ValueTuple`2 param) // Tuple param?
at Program.<Start>g__LocalFunc1|11_0(Int64 l) // local function
at Program.<Start>g__LocalFunc2|11_1(Boolean b1, Boolean b2) // local function
at Program.Start()
at Program.<>c.<.ctor>b__1_0() // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.<>c__DisplayClass2_0.<.ctor>b__0(Object state) // ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
at Program.RunAction(Action`1 lambda, Object state)
at Program..ctor(Action action) // constructor
at Program..ctor() // constructor
at Program.Main(String[] args)
Which is far less helpful, and close to jibberish in places
Problems with current stack traces:
constructors
Does not match code, output as
.ctor
and.cctor
parameters
Do not specify qualifier
ref
,out
orin
iterators
Cannot determine overload
<Iterator>d__3.MoveNext()
rather thanIterator(int startAt)+MoveNext()
Linq
Cannot determine overload
Linq.Enumerable.SelectEnumerableIterator``2.MoveNext()
rather than
Linq.Enumerable+SelectEnumerableIterator<TSource, TResult>.MoveNext()
async
Cannot determine overload and no modifier such as
async
<MethodAsync>d__5``1.MoveNext()
rather than
async Task<string> Program.MethodAsync(int value)
Noise!
--- End of stack trace from previous location where exception was thrown --- at System.Runtime.ExceptionServices.ExceptionDispatchInfo.Throw() at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ThrowForNonSuccess(Task task) at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.HandleNonSuccessAndDebuggerNotification(Task task) at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.ValidateEnd(Task task) at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.TaskAwaiter.GetResult()
lambdas
Mostly jibberish
<>c__DisplayClass2_0.<.ctor>b__0(Object state)
with a suggestion of where they are declared but no hint if there are multiple overloads of the method.local functions
Mostly jibberish
<RefMethod>g__LocalFuncParam|10_0(String val, <>c__DisplayClass10_0& )
with a suggestion of where they are declared but no hint if there are multiple overloads of the method.generic parameters
Not resolved, only an indication of the number
RunLambda(Func``1 lambda)
rather thanRunLambda(Func<string> lambda)
value tuples
Do not match code, output as
ValueTuple``2 param
rather than(string val, bool) param
primitive types
Do not match code, output as
Int64
,Boolean
,String
rather thanlong
,bool
,string
return types
Skipped entirely from method signature
Benchmarks
To run benchmarks from the repository root:
dotnet run -p .\test\Ben.Demystifier.Benchmarks\ -c Release -f netcoreapp2.0 All
Note: we're only kicking off via netcoreapp2.0
, benchmarks will run for all configured platforms like net462
.
Showing the top 20 packages that depend on Ben.Demystifier.
Packages | Downloads |
---|---|
Serilog.Enrichers.WithCaller
Log message Enrichter, adding caller and code line infos
|
6 |
.NET Framework 4.5
- System.Reflection.Metadata (>= 5.0.0)
- System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions (>= 4.5.4)
.NET Standard 2.0
- System.Reflection.Metadata (>= 5.0.0)
- System.Threading.Tasks.Extensions (>= 4.5.4)
.NET Standard 2.1
- System.Reflection.Metadata (>= 5.0.0)